0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Modeling Schemes and Performance Comparisons of Unbonded and Partially Bonded Tendon in Post-Tensioned Concrete Beam

Auteur(s):



Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Buildings, , n. 6, v. 14
Page(s): 1682
DOI: 10.3390/buildings14061682
Abstrait:

The modeling method of unbonded effects is a challenging and hot topic for the structural performance analysis of unbonded and partially bonded post-tensioned concrete beams. The main concerns accounting for the unbonded effects are the longitudinal free-slip behaviors and the vertical deformation compatibility relationship between the unbonded tendon and concrete beam. Three modeling schemes, namely, the beam–truss element model, the slipping cable element model, and the slack spring model, are presented in this paper. These modeling schemes are, for the first time, systematically compared regarding applicability, convenience, and accuracy. Then, these modeling schemes are applied to experimental beams with different tendon layouts and bonding conditions, including external tendons, internal unbonded tendons, and partially bonded tendons. The beam–truss element model and the slipping cable element model are only applicable to the fully bonded and unbonded members, respectively. The slack spring model is recommended as the generally applicable model for analyzing post-tensioned concrete beams with different bonding conditions. Crucial suggestions are put forward as to the zero-length slack spring element, which have the potential to improve the prediction accuracy for tendon stress. In addition, parametrical analysis is conducted to determine the influence of unbonded length on flexural performance. With the increase of unbonded length, the flexural capacity of the beam will decrease, but the self-centering performance can be improved. Interestingly, the effects of unbonded length on the structural deformability are not monotonic, and the reasons for this are clarified.

Copyright: © 2024 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original.

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10787828
  • Publié(e) le:
    20.06.2024
  • Modifié(e) le:
    25.01.2025
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine