• DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Field Tests on Total Gap of Modular Expansion Joints to Avoid Bridge Pounding

  1. Bi (2012), "Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions" in Probab. Eng. Mech., v. 29 (2012), p. 92

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.09.002

  2. Bi, Kaiming / Hao, Hong / Chouw, Nawawi (2010): Required separation distance between decks and at abutments of a bridge crossing a canyon site to avoid seismic pounding. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 39, n. 3 (mars 2010).

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.943

  3. Bi, Kaiming / Hao, Hong / Chouw, Nawawi (2011): Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 40, n. 9 (25 juillet 2011).

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1076

  4. Bolt (1982), "Preliminary Report on the SMART-1 Strong Motion Array in Taiwan"
  5. Buckingham (1914), "On Physically Similar systems: Illustration of the Use of Dimensional Equations"
  6. Chouw (2016), ""Dynamics of bridge structures,”"Innovative Bridge Design Handbook", p. 127

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800058-8.00006-2

  7. Chouw, N. / Hao, H. (2008): Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: Effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Dans: Engineering Structures, v. 30, n. 1 (janvier 2008).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.002

  8. Chouw (2009), "Seismic design of bridge structures with allowance for large relative girder movements to avoid pounding" in Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., v. 42 (2009), p. 75
  9. Clyde (2000), "Full-Scale Dynamic Testing of Expansion Joints for Seismically Isolated Bridges"
  10. Dumanogluid, A. A. / Soyluk, K. (2003): A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions including the site-response effect. Dans: Engineering Structures, v. 25, n. 10 (août 2003).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00080-4

  11. Hao (1998), "A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake" in Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., v. 27 (1998), p. 97

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199801)27:191::AID-EQE7223.0.CO;2-I

  12. Hao (1989), "Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data" in Nucl. Eng. Des., v. 111 (1989), p. 293

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(89)90241-0

  13. Hao (2007), "Design of bridges with modular expansion joints for prevention of earthquake-induced girder poundings"
  14. Japan Road Association (JRA) (2004), "Specifications for Highway Bridges-Part V Seismic Design"
  15. Johnson, Nathan / Ranf, Richard T. / Saiidi, M. Saiid / Sanders, David / Eberhard, Marc (2008): Seismic Testing of a Two-Span Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Dans: Journal of Bridge Engineering (ASCE), v. 13, n. 2 (mars 2008).

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2008)13:2(173)

  16. Der Kiureghian, Armen / Neuenhofer, Ansgar (1992): Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 21, n. 8 (août 1992).

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210805

  17. Li, Bo / Bi, Kaiming / Chouw, Nawawi / Butterworth, John W. / Hao, Hong (2012): Experimental investigation of spatially varying effect of ground motions on bridge pounding. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 41, n. 14 (novembre 2012).

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2168

  18. Li, Bo / Bi, Kaiming / Chouw, Nawawi / Butterworth, John W. / Hao, Hong (2013): Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding. Dans: Engineering Structures, v. 54 (septembre 2013).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.034

  19. Moncarz (1981), "Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earthquake Engineering"
  20. New Zealand Standards (2004), "NZS 1170.5. Earthquake Actions"
  21. Park (1999), "Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW)" in Geophysics, v. 64 (1999), p. 800

    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590

  22. Price, Thomas E. / Eberhard, Marc O. (1998): Effects of Spatially Varying Ground Motions on Short Bridges. Dans: Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), v. 124, n. 8 (août 1998).

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:8(948)

  23. Abdel Raheem, Shehata E. (2009): Pounding mitigation and unseating prevention at expansion joints of isolated multi-span bridges. Dans: Engineering Structures, v. 31, n. 10 (octobre 2009).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.010

  24. Rizza (1973), "Modular Expansion Joint"
  25. Saiidi, M. Saiid / Vosooghi, Ashkan / Nelson, Robert B. (2013): Shake-Table Studies of a Four-Span Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Dans: Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), v. 139, n. 8 (août 2013).

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000790

  26. Spuler (2011), "Developments in modular expansion joint technology-codes and testing in Australia, America and Europe"
  27. Spuler, Thomas / Moor, Gianni (2004): Modular expansion joints for world's largest bridges. Présenté pendant: Metropolitan Habitats and Infrastructure, IABSE Symposium, Shanghai, China, 22-24.09.2004.

    https://doi.org/10.2749/222137804796302428

  28. Tokeshi (2008), "Estimation of Vs profile using its natural frequency and Rayleigh-wave dispersion characteristics" in Adv. Geosci., v. 14 (2008), p. 75

    https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-14-75-2008

  29. Washington State Department of Transportation (2011), in Bridge Design Manual
  30. Wieser (2012), "Experimental evaluation of seismic pounding at seat-type abutments of horizontally curved bridges"

    https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.055

  31. California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) (2010), "Seismic Design Criteria. Design Manual Version 1.6", p. 1066
  32. Yang (2011), "Shake table test of cable-stayed bridge subjected to non-uniform excitation" in Procedia Eng., v. 14 (2011), p. 931

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.117

  33. Yang, Qingshan / Saiidi, M. Saiid / Hang, Wang / Itani, Ahmad (2002): Influence of earthquake ground motion incoherency on multi-support structures. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, v. 1, n. 2 (décembre 2002).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0063-4

  34. Zerva, Aspasia (1990): Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions. Dans: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 19, n. 6 (août 1990).

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190604

  35. Zerva (2002), "Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview" in Appl. Mech. Rev., v. 55 (2002), p. 271

    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1458013

Publicité

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10379480
  • Publié(e) le:
    11.11.2019
  • Modifié(e) le:
    11.11.2019