0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Auteur(s):
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Engineering Journal, , n. 1, v. 1
Page(s): 12-15
DOI: 10.62913/engj.v1i1.6
Abstrait:

The revision of the AISC Specification adopted in November, 1961 contained a large number of new provisions reflecting extensive research sponsored by the Institute during the previous decade. Yet none of these have provoked as much discussion (and misunderstanding) as those in Sect. 1.8 which relate allowable axial stress in compression to an effective column length instead of to the actual unbraced length as in earlier editions. Oddly enough, the underlying theory here is by no means new. Why, then, is it only now receiving recognition in American specifications? The answer lies in two recent developments both of which place greater emphasis than previously on the possibility of overall frame instability; the introduction of high strength steels and the trend towards light wall constructions.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.62913/engj.v1i1.6.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10783563
  • Publié(e) le:
    16.05.2024
  • Modifié(e) le:
    16.05.2024
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine