0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Design criteria for upstream raised tailings storage facilities

Auteur(s):
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, , n. 2, v. 65
Page(s): 10-16
DOI: 10.17159/2309-8775/2023/v65n2a2
Abstrait:

For more than 100 years upstreaming has been the dominant raising method for tailings storage facilities in Southern Africa. However, there is a growing view worldwide that upstreaming is inherently less safe than centreline or downstream raising of tailings storage facilities. Considering that more than 90% of the 250 plus operational tailings storing facilities in Southern Africa are upstream raised and cannot economically be converted to, or replaced by, downstream raised facilities, the arguments for and against upstreaming were examined in this study. It was found that no compelling reason exists to ban upstreaming in Southern Africa, provided that failure mechanisms are thoroughly considered to prevent serious design omissions. The ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable) approach is introduced as a practical method to deal with the risk of failure, and its hierarchical application is illustrated.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.17159/2309-8775/2023/v65n2a2.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10734721
  • Publié(e) le:
    01.09.2023
  • Modifié(e) le:
    01.09.2023
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine