0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Auteur(s): ORCID
ORCID

Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Buildings, , n. 8, v. 12
Page(s): 1192
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12081192
Abstrait:

Though studies in construction robotics and human–robot teams research have explored varying themes, an in-depth study of the state-of-the-art of methodological paradigms appropriate for construction robotics research is hitherto lacking, taking into consideration that several studies have highlighted conflicting methodological components such as research design, methods, data sources, data types and analytical techniques. To better understand this underexplored area, this study uses a four-stage review approach utilising a scientometric and systematic analysis method based on 112 articles. Using statistical analysis to evaluate the relationship between research components, the study reveals strong associations between components of research methods, data sources and analytical techniques. Researchers are also increasingly looking to mixed paradigms in data sources and designs, highlighting a methodological plurality in construction robotics research. Implications on what this means for the future of construction robotics, policy and stakeholders are discussed in the study.

Copyright: © 2022 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original.

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10688442
  • Publié(e) le:
    13.08.2022
  • Modifié(e) le:
    10.11.2022
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine