0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

A Comparison of Classifier Performance for Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motor using Multi-type Signals

Auteur(s):





Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Structural Health Monitoring, , n. 3, v. 6
Page(s): 215-229
DOI: 10.1177/1475921707081110
Abstrait:

Fault detection and diagnosis is the most important technology in condition-based maintenance (CBM) systems, which typically starts from collecting signatures of running machines by multiple sensors for subsequent accurate analysis. Recently, there has been an increasing requirement of selecting special sensors, which are cheap, robust, easily installed, and good classifiers that have accurate classification, stable performance, and short calculating time. This article carries out a comparative study of various classification algorithms for fault diagnosis of electric motors using different types of signals. The authors evaluate experimentally the relative performances of five classifiers using five types of steady-state signals based on three kinds of performance evaluation strategies: training-test, cross-validation, and similar measure. First, the raw signals are collected and features are extracted from the collected signals. Then, the extracted features are classified using the five classification algorithms. Next, an overall comparison of the five classifiers is described, and experiment results are discussed. Finally, conclusions are summarized and suggestions are offered.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.1177/1475921707081110.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10561563
  • Publié(e) le:
    11.02.2021
  • Modifié(e) le:
    19.02.2021
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine