Can quality be managed and assured in architecture? Issues of qualification and quantification
Quality
Auteur(s): |
Stephen Kite
|
---|---|
Médium: | article de revue |
Langue(s): | anglais |
Publié dans: | arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, décembre 2007, n. 3-4, v. 11 |
Page(s): | 195-197 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s1359135500000695 |
Abstrait: |
‘Quality’ has become ubiquitous in the management vocabulary of Western societies. In consequence, the word's familiar usage has grown slippery. Formerly grounded in ethical values or skilled craftsmanship, ‘quality’ is now commonly associated with the management of administrative or technical processes. Whereas the appreciation of quality was founded in the exercise of individual judgement and taste – of connoisseurship – organisations now seek to ground its assessment in supposedly objective systems of evaluation. Practitioners are under pressure to quantify quality, but it remains questionable whether it is possible or even desirable to do so. Several papers in this issue ofarqderive from a conference exploring such themes around the idea ofQuality, an event held at the Welsh School of Architecture in July 2007 and reviewed here. |
- Informations
sur cette fiche - Reference-ID
10355601 - Publié(e) le:
13.08.2019 - Modifié(e) le:
13.08.2019