• DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Axial Shortening Compensation Strategies in Tall Buildings. A Case Study: The New Piedmont Government Office Tower

  1. Fintel M, "Chapter 10, multistory structures", section 10.9.2, vertical movements due to creep and shrinkage, Handbook of Concrete Engineering, Fintel M (ed), 2nd edn, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985; 391–397.
  2. Carreira DJ, Poulos TD. Designing for Effects of Creep and Shrinkage in High-Rise Concrete Buildings. ACI SP-246-7, 2005; 107–125.
  3. Smith BS, Loull A. Tall Building Structures Analysis and Design, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
  4. Baker WF, Korista DS, Novak LC, Pawlikowski J, Young B. Creep and shrinkage and the design of super tall buildings–a case study: the Burj Dubai Tower. In ACI SP-246-8. Structural Implications of Shrinkage and Creep of Concrete, 2007; 200–220.
  5. Fintel M, Ghosh SK, Iyengar H. Column Shortening in Tall Structures-Prediction and Compensation, 2nd edn, Portland Cement Association: Skokie, IL, 1987.
  6. Cosenza E, Debernardi PG. Calculation of stresses, deformations and deflections of reinforce d and prestressed concrete elements in service. CEB Bulletin d'Information n.235, Lausanne, 1997, 105–141.
  7. CEN. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1 – General Rules and Rules for Buildings. CEN: Brussels, 2004.
  8. Terrey PJ, Bradford MA, Gilbert RI. Creep and shrinkage in concrete-filled steel tubes. In: Tubular Structures VI., Grundy P, Holgate A, Wong SM (eds), Balkema: Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1994; 293–298.

Publicité

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10079257
  • Création
    06.10.2018
  • Modification
    18.10.2018