0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Autor(en):
Medium: Fachartikel
Sprache(n): Englisch
Veröffentlicht in: Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE), , n. 8, v. 103
Seite(n): 1655-1672
DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0004701
Abstrakt:

The George Washington Bridge raised two fundamental problems in the history and esthetics of bridge deisgn: (1) The relationship between esthetic preference and structural performance; and (2) the relationship between the architecture of bridges and their engineering. The first relationship was put in terms of the flexible deck: the George Washington Bridge, as originally complete in 1931, had almost no vertical stiffness. The second relationship arose in the design of the towers, for which architectural plans envisioned masonry forms while engineering requirements dictated a steel structure. Thus, that design followed from two questionable assumptions: (!) The deck could be without vertical stiffness; and (2) the steel towers should be civered with a masonry façade. The first led directly to the failor of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940, and the second carried forward the idea that in large-scale structures, the engineering form needed an architectural façade to be elegant.

Bauwerke und Projekte

Bauwerkstypen

Personen

Structurae kann Ihnen derzeit diese Veröffentlichung nicht im Volltext zur Verfügung stellen. Der Volltext ist beim Verlag erhältlich über die DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0004701.
  • Über diese
    Datenseite
  • Reference-ID
    10000377
  • Veröffentlicht am:
    17.10.1999
  • Geändert am:
    25.02.2021
 
Structurae kooperiert mit
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine