Autor(en): |
Susanne Hauser
|
---|---|
Medium: | Fachartikel |
Sprache(n): | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht in: | arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, März 2017, n. 1, v. 21 |
Seite(n): | 45-52 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s1359135517000136 |
Abstrakt: |
Translating the German expressionsEntwurforEntwerfeninto English seems to be an easy task: ‘design’ or ‘designing’ are the common choices recommended by dictionaries whenever a translation ofEntwerfenorEntwurfis intended. The mutual translatability is evident since both ‘designing’ andEntwerfenrefer to the same phase of an architectural process. Similarly,Entwurfand ‘design’ refer to the outcome of the architectural process as well. This confirms their exchangeability. It is notable that there are no similarly convincing alternative translations available, at least not in the form of single words or short expressions. ‘both “designing” and Entwerfen refer to the same phase of an architectural process [and…] to the outcome of the architectural process‘ But there is no doubt that the expressions ‘design’ andEntwurfrefer to different practices and media. They stress different aspects of the process of developing new concepts, ideas or objects, and different aspects of the result. This is why the common translation becomes dubious. Translating proves to be a challenge. The term ‘design’ offers characteristic and conceptually important qualities, as does the German wordEntwurf, and the implications of each are so different that there is some doubt that ‘design(ing)’ can function as the adequate translation ofEntwerfen. |
- Über diese
Datenseite - Reference-ID
10354887 - Veröffentlicht am:
13.08.2019 - Geändert am:
13.08.2019