Practical Examples of Successful Design Review
|
|
|||||||||||
Bibliografische Angaben
| Autor(en): |
Eric Brehm
(University of Applied Sciences Karlsruhe; BVPI. E.V.)
Robert Hertle (BVPI e.V.; Hertle Ingenieure; Technical University of Munich) Alastair Soane (Structural-Safety) Markus Wetzel (BVPI. e.V.; Wetzel & von Seht) Thomas Hertle (University of the German Federal Armed Forces – UniBW) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium: | Tagungsbeitrag | ||||
| Sprache(n): | Englisch | ||||
| Tagung: | IABSE Congress: The Evolving Metropolis, New York, NY, USA, 4-6 September 2019 | ||||
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Evolving Metropolis | ||||
|
|||||
| Seite(n): | 2156-2164 | ||||
| Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): | 9 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/newyork.2019.2156 | ||||
| Abstrakt: |
Human error is the major cause for structural collapse [1]. Design review is the most effective way to rid human errors out of the design process and thus most societies have implemented procedures for design review. Naturally, different systems come with different properties in terms of effectiveness and error-proneness. This paper will provide practical examples of successful design review and will derive challenges and methods of counteraction during the design review process. Emphasis will be on realistic examples as a basis for a theoretical derivation of improved design review concepts. |
||||
| Stichwörter: |
Menschliche Fehler
|
||||