Defining a Bridge Maintenance Strategy – Some Practical Constraints
|
|
|||||||||||
Bibliografische Angaben
| Autor(en): |
Kristian Schellenberg
(Heribert Huber Consulting, Schattdorf, Switzerland)
Reto Hess (Heribert Huber Consulting, Schattdorf, Switzerland) Riet Müller (Heribert Huber Consulting, Schattdorf, Switzerland) Heribert Huber (Heribert Huber Consulting, Schattdorf, Switzerland) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium: | Tagungsbeitrag | ||||
| Sprache(n): | Englisch | ||||
| Tagung: | IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-23 September 2016 | ||||
| Veröffentlicht in: | IABSE Congress Stockholm, 2016 | ||||
|
|||||
| Seite(n): | 1477-1484 | ||||
| Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): | 8 | ||||
| Jahr: | 2016 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/stockholm.2016.1472 | ||||
| Abstrakt: |
In order to maintain approximately 1500 engineering structures, the road office of Grisons in Switzerland has to repair or replace between 30 and 50 structures each year. Timing and scope of interventions is mainly driven by the condition state of the structures and options to coordinate construction works with fulfilling other requirements on the same road. A sustainable maintenance plan has not only to ensure structural safety and serviceability in the long term; but a high road availability and a reduction of overall maintenance costs are of similar high priority and further issues to consider. This contribution shows also, how budget, capacities, structural condition as well as changes of road geometry requirements and load bearing capacities influenced the definition of the asset specific bridge maintenance strategy. |
||||
| Stichwörter: |
Bestandsbewertung
|
||||