0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Autor(en):
Medium: Fachartikel
Sprache(n): Englisch
Veröffentlicht in: Engineering Journal, , n. 2, v. 25
Seite(n): 79-84
DOI: 10.62913/engj.v25i2.497
Abstrakt:

The new Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings will eventually replace the existing Allowable Stress Design Specification for normal engineering design. The speed with which this takes place depends to a large extent on its inclusion in basic undergraduate curriculum. Past experience with major changes in code concepts, such as the reinforced concrete code change from working stress to ultimate strength, has shown the integration of these new concepts into professional practice is due, in large part, to the influx of new graduates into practice. This paper looks at the incorporation of LRFD concepts into a structural engineering curriculum. It identifies some of the advantages and disadvantages of both allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD) and proposes four options for addressing LRFD and its impact on an academic program.

Structurae kann Ihnen derzeit diese Veröffentlichung nicht im Volltext zur Verfügung stellen. Der Volltext ist beim Verlag erhältlich über die DOI: 10.62913/engj.v25i2.497.
  • Über diese
    Datenseite
  • Reference-ID
    10783027
  • Veröffentlicht am:
    17.05.2024
  • Geändert am:
    17.05.2024
 
Structurae kooperiert mit
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine