The lily, client and measure of Bruno Taut's Glashaus
Autor(en): |
David Nielsen
Anoma Kumarasuriyar |
---|---|
Medium: | Fachartikel |
Sprache(n): | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht in: | arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, September 2014, n. 3, v. 18 |
Seite(n): | 257-266 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s1359135514000608 |
Abstrakt: |
A current issue in architectural scholarship is the rethinking of the origins of Modernism. As a formative exemplar of early architectural Modernism, Bruno Taut's seminal exhibition pavilion, theGlashaus(1914) [1] is understandably part of this debate. In 1959, Reyner Banham in his article, ‘The Glass Paradise’ suggested that it would be appropriate to investigate the origins of the Glashaus, as it was both vastly dissimilar to and exceeded any of Taut's previous designs. In an effort to answer this question, Banham subsequently introduced the unique role played by the Bohemian poet Paul Scheerbart in the design of theGlashaus. As a result of Banham's inference, Rosemarie Haag Bletter systematically explored the Taut/Scheerbart relationship in ‘Bruno Taut and Paul Scheerbart's Vision: Utopian Aspects of German Expressionist Architecture’ in 1973. |
- Über diese
Datenseite - Reference-ID
10355108 - Veröffentlicht am:
13.08.2019 - Geändert am:
13.08.2019