Autor(en): |
David Wang
|
---|---|
Medium: | Fachartikel |
Sprache(n): | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht in: | arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, März 2009, n. 1, v. 13 |
Seite(n): | 49-58 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s1359135509990091 |
Abstrakt: |
By any measure Thomas Kuhn'sThe Structure of Scientific Revolutionsis a landmark in recent influential ideas. The very term ‘paradigm shift’, now common parlance, derives from this 1962 work. Structure redirected its own domain, the philosophy of science, from a logical positivist orientation in its evaluation of scientific progress to one that accommodates a complex mix of sociological, linguistic and psychological factors. Perhaps because of this interdisciplinary inclusiveness, Kuhn's insights have informed theory in many disciplines. A survey of the recent literature includes works in anthropology, comparative literature, criminal justice, art history, education and feminist studies. |
- Über diese
Datenseite - Reference-ID
10355548 - Veröffentlicht am:
13.08.2019 - Geändert am:
13.08.2019