0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Comparison of Selected Model Evaluation Criteria for Maintenance Applications

Autor(en):



Medium: Fachartikel
Sprache(n): Englisch
Veröffentlicht in: Structural Health Monitoring, , n. 3, v. 3
Seite(n): 213-224
DOI: 10.1177/1475921704042696
Abstrakt:

Model-based preventive maintenance relies on creating models that can either predict future operating states or upcoming failures directly. Since no modeling algorithm can guarantee a best solution in every situation, it becomes necessary to evaluate the solutions generated by these techniques. This paper reviews some popular criteria traditionally employed in model evaluation. Several evaluation criteria proposed in the literature are restricted in their applicability because of their assumptions about the modeling process/data. Some evaluation criteria are tested on two artificial data sets. The results from our tests indicate that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) has superior performance. The conclusion has been used and verified in one industrial monitoring application.

Structurae kann Ihnen derzeit diese Veröffentlichung nicht im Volltext zur Verfügung stellen. Der Volltext ist beim Verlag erhältlich über die DOI: 10.1177/1475921704042696.
  • Über diese
    Datenseite
  • Reference-ID
    10561489
  • Veröffentlicht am:
    11.02.2021
  • Geändert am:
    19.02.2021
 
Structurae kooperiert mit
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine