Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Procedures for the Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Straight Multi-Span RC Bridges

The assessment of the seismic performance of transportation infrastructures is of primary importance for the management of the aftermath of an earthquake. To perform such an assessment, various modeling approaches characterized by different levels of accuracy are available and modern seismic design codes provide recommendations about their use. Non-linear time-history analysis (NLTHA) is acknowledged as the most reliable method, but is difficult to implement and is computationally expensive. This paper aims to investigate the viability of less complex methods, but with low computational cost, for the assessment of straight, multi-span bridges and compare their performance against the results of NLTHA in order to quantify the expected accuracy. The study is developed considering three bridge archetypes with either simply-supported or continuous-deck layouts, representative of typical features of the Italian bridge stock. The bridges are analyzed first through nonlinear dynamic analyses, to define the benchmark solution; then linear dynamic analyses, such as Linear Time-History and Response Spectrum Analysis, nonlinear static analyses, such as MPA (Modal Pushover Analysis), and Equivalent Static Analysis are considered. A comparison among the examined procedures is eventually proposed, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Dieses Werk wurde unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) veröffentlicht und darf unter den Lizenzbedinungen vervielfältigt, verbreitet, öffentlich zugänglich gemacht, sowie abgewandelt und bearbeitet werden. Dabei muss der Urheber bzw. Rechteinhaber genannt und die Lizenzbedingungen eingehalten werden.