Assessment of General Method for Composite Column Design in En 1994-1-1 and Comparison with Simplified Method
Autor(en): |
Markus Schäfer
(University of Luxembourg, Department of Engineering, Structural Engineering & Composite Structures)
Qingjie Zhang (University of Luxembourg, Department of Engineering, Structural Engineering & Composite Structures) Pëllumb Zogu (University of Luxembourg, Department of Engineering, Structural Engineering & Composite Structures) Marco Bergmann (HRA Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH Bochum) Ozgun Ergun (University of Luxembourg, Department of Engineering, Structural Engineering & Composite Structures) |
---|---|
Medium: | Fachartikel |
Sprache(n): | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht in: | ce/papers, Februar 2023, n. 1, v. 6 |
Seite(n): | 195-206 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cepa.1904 |
Abstrakt: |
Composite column design in accordance with EN 1994‐1‐1 can be computed by the general method or by simplified methods. For the general method, EN 1994‐1‐1 refers to a comprehensive FE‐Analysis. However, the recent Eurocode 4 does not provide sufficient guidance for the application of the general method and there is not a harmony in the literature on how to do it. Additional information may be found as non‐contradictory complementary information (NCI) in National Annexes (NA). This paper points out the procedure for the general method and refers to the changes and additional information provided by the draft of prEN 1994‐1‐1:2021. Furthermore, the modelling and computation by FE‐Analysis for several software applications are presented by implementing specified initial bow imperfections and predefined residual stresses for the steel section. The results obtained with the general method's approach are compared with that calculated by simplified method by the European buckling curves. In addition, the impact of different stress‐strain curves for concrete and strain limits introduced by Codes are investigated. |
- Über diese
Datenseite - Reference-ID
10767459 - Veröffentlicht am:
17.04.2024 - Geändert am:
17.04.2024